


SAP HANA Studio consists of different perspectives one of One of the downsides of SAP BW/4HANA is that it doesn’t support planning applications due to which customers need to wait for future updates for migration. Though this migration has been started from SAP BW 7.4, but it isĪlmost at its completion in SAP BW/4HANA. Traditional GUI to HANA studio and now the data modelling is taken place in That is no longer supported before moving to BW/4HANA.Īnother difference is that SAP VW has been shifted from SAP provides programs that can do thisĬonversion but there will be some pre-migration effort to clean up everything IfĪ customer wishes to move to BW/4HANA, they need to convert all such legacy That BW/4HANA no longer supports those old objects like InfoCubes and DSOs. The primary difference between BW on HANA and BW/4HANA is Difference between SAP BW on HANA 7.5 and SAP BW/4HANA SAP BW/4HANA looks almost similar to SAP BW on HANA however Sap BW/4HANA stands out to be more efficient than SAP BW on HANA. SAP BW on HANA 7.5 has stronger and more efficient architecture and provides the base for the development of SAP BW/4HANA. Then came version 7.5 which stands out to be the most updated version till this point. The data model too started to be moved from traditional GUI to HANA studio environment. Later version 7.4 tried to reduce complexities by reducing the number of development objects. Though these improvements helped a lot, there were still many issues which were required to deal with. The initial version of SAP BW on HANA 7.3 was mainly focused on reducing the layers and speeding up the load time. SAP put BW on HANA platform putting off from the traditional database, resulting in redesigning of BW development. It is a revolutionary database works on the cloud platform. SAP BW to SAP BW/4HANA – Major difference and UpdatesĪfter having many downsides of SAP BW, SAP launched HANA. Of-course the job would be competed but not fast. It took much time for data to reach the final destination of reporting layer from source as it has to pass from multiple layers.


One of the major ones is that it has multiple layers of redundant data and transforming data which slow done the data processing work. In Maharashtra, and Delhi the claim settlement by insurance companies decreased by 34 per cent and 39 per cent, respectively.SAP BW, before coming under HANA platform was having many pitfalls. The highest number of insurance claims were settled/booked in Kerala (52,301), Telangana (48,036), Karnataka (43,653), and Uttar Pradesh (35,967). ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Limited paid Rs 3,28,95,770, The New India Assurance Company Limited compensated Rs 2,85,87,469 to the claimants, and Tata AIG General Insurance Company Limited paid Rs 2,60,54,000. This was followed by National Insurance Company Limited, which paid claimants worth Rs 4,81,67,969. The maximum compensation paid to claimants in 2020-21 was by Reliance General Insurance Company Limited, worth Rs 5,31,28,212. Further, Lok Sabha was informed that the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (IRDAI) said that the details of minimum compensation paid are not maintained as the said database captures all payouts under motor third party insurance and it is not possible to know whether a particular amount mentioned in the database is an expense or a compensation amount.
